Moved before art

What is required, in order that we may be moved? It’s election season, and so getting voters to bother in order to get a candidate over the line, defeat the fascists, save what needs saving are all familiar. Or become familiar again – we always need refreshing and reminding, suggesting that we,  or at least a great majority of us, default to an unmoved state. Why this is so and clearly observable is interesting on its own – savvy, cynical, overindulged, entertained to boredom? – but not the point here and I trust there is one.

A thing less caused by duress that might conjure our being touched, stirred, triggered in the parlance, toward some deep, emotion reaction, speaks more to the missing element than a threat’s reminder. We cultivate a different relationship with perceptions of things (or people) as marginal, that keystroke which leads to indifference. We become acquainted to those, perhaps to the point of even preferring them as an antidote to feeling or being bothered; confessions about this analgesic effect on our psyche readily reveal the why and how of pharmaceutical and entertainment industries designed for succor and we are presently dropped back into a chicken-and-egg debate itself designed to go not further.

Separated into special trips to the museum,  objects within them become otherwise monuments to their impossibility, especially so the impossibility of encounters with them as art that moves us. A painting or sculpture in the wild – a photographer friend once installed an entire show in a deep woods, precisely and only for those who might accidentally discover it – is not after all in the wild or naturally occurring. Yet it is deliberate, as is our maintaining of preference for engaging with it. We do these things on purpose not once in a while but on the regular, cultivating in a true sense our own power to be moved, keeping it limber, flexible, not in need of fury though neither beyond it. Far less effort than remaining unmoved, the sway of a leg or reach of a perfect hand should stir us with instantaneous, ready fascination – that is, we promote and prioritize that possibility within us. Daily, if we can; hourly, if we’re lucky.

Marginalization of sensual effects upon leaves us reeling in the face of those who temp, scare, or frighten us with the artificial, which should hold far less sway over us than it does. But we struggle with the demigods of artificiality, as if any of their product worthwhile upon our senses, our capacity to stir, and be stirred. Figurative language was the first to be born, proper meanings the very last to be found. Provocation on this continuum should be the bare minimum.

Now don’t forget to vote.

Image: From the aforementioned forest photo show by Shaman.

Just Fight

Trump Admin creative tactics to fight climate change, despite themselves.

See? It matters how news is contextualized.

Brazilian farmers were sure a Swedish-Finnish multinational was planting eucalyptus trees on public land. And they were right:

Surrounded by nearly 100,000 hectares (247,000 acres) of eucalyptus plantations, Baixa Verde is a rare example of a local victory over a multinational in Brazil. The rural settlement owes its existence to nearly two decades of legal battles over land rights – but the fight is not over yet.

After fighting to retain their land, the families now face an unprecedented security crisis marked by armed clashes, arson and death threats, part of a wave of violence driven by a land dispute that has escalated since 2024.

Conflicts over land rights have long been an issue in the region. Obtaining property titles is commonly deemed to legitimise land grabs from traditional communities, and local people had suspected that Veracel Celulose – a pulp-production company jointly owned by the Swedish-Finnish company Stora Enso and the giant Brazilian pulp manufacturer Suzano – was planting eucalyptus trees on public land.

In 2008, Ercilio Souza, one of the founders of the Baixa Verde settlement, and Juenildo Oliveira Farias visited government archives to review public documents. They found the page that proved the 1,300 hectares in dispute were owned by the government. “We always knew that it was public land,” says Souza.

With the document in hand, they assembled 91 local families and joined the Fight for Land Movement (MLT), a ​​political and social organisation fighting for agrarian reform. Its first action was to occupy an area of a eucalyptus plantation used by Veracel, accusing the company of using public land.

Stories like this one may quickly disappear but we should give them more credence, if not prominence (attaboy, Guardian). Rather than the binary – this is great/that is awful –take some time to unpack a story and understand its complexities as a throughway, as appropriate. Be critical. Withhold the benefit of the doubt until it is deserved.

Also, wtf, Swedish-Finnish conglomerate, get your act together.

Image: A eucalyptus plantation in Baixa Verde owned by Veracel Celulose.  Photograph: Sara Van Horn (Guardian)

Indy retailing Green

Independent_decreaseD.I.Y. is everywhere – look at this blog you’re reading, the e-book you could be reading there to the right. All of this is good, but it’s easy to be just a wasteful as large corporations, only on a small scale. But independent retailers can make being green part of their business plan from the get-go. A reader sends this handy guide:

4. Reduce paper use. Print double-sided, reuse printed paper for scrap paper, and think before you print.

5. Buy local. When possible, source your products from local distributors or producers to reduce fossil fuel use.

6. Go digital. Switch to digital bill payment, invoicing, banking and ordering. You can also send email rather than printed memos or offer downloadable employee handbooks. Use an eFax service instead of a paper machine.

7. Get rid of Styrofoam. Styrofoam is one of the least environmentally friendly products you can use. Find alternatives to Styrofoam for everything from cups to packing peanuts, both in what you sell and in what you use in the warehouse.

It would be great if all of this was just common sense, but we’re not quite there yet. I particularly like number 19. Create incentives, reward people for not being in cars. We’ll get the message.

Image: symbol for independent decrease, used in mounting circuit breakers and industrial control equipment inside equipment racks, via wikimedia commons.